Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rich James's avatar

I’m all for something that will help college students plan and implement effective study strategies. I’ve been out of higher education for a few years now but I am aware of learning management systems moving in this direction, albeit more for instructors and advising teams to collect data than to guide students. What you are proposing is more at the level of the personal study assistant. I applaud the effort and direction.

Allow me to offer some critical perspective based on a few things I see and don’t see in this description. The ed-tech space has seen many attempts at, and promises about, personalization that haven't delivered meaningful results. The app appears to be content agnostic, so it is even more important that it gets some fundamentals about learning right, and avoid what is ineffective.

How well is the knowledge base of the model grounded in evidence for how people learn? When I read "learning patterns and preferences," I hear the theory of “learning styles,” a thoroughly debunked and pernicious myth. I looked for, but did not see, evidence-based principles from cognitive science that are applicable in all learning domains: spacing, retrieval, elaboration, generation, interleaving, and dual-coding to name several. Absent these, I am concerned about how effectively this tool will guide students.

We want students to develop accurate metacognition and self-regulation. A study assistant should be grounded in how to give students the right feedback, and guide them to make the right effort, to develop those skills. Effort is the key ingredient. A study assistant that removes cognitive effort may be removing the work that permits growth. I didn’t see the terms “metacognition” or “self-regulation” so these may be a significant gap in the assistant’s knowledge base and how it applies algorithms to giving feedback and direction.

What is “cognitive rhythm?” I am ABD in instructional design and have advocated for evidence-informed practice for many years. No such concept exists in the literature that I know of. Feedback on choosing a study environment could be helpful. Does the app understand that varied context can be helpful for learning? Again, I worry that conventional wisdom may replace more evidence informed and nuanced recommendations.

While this is billed as personal assistant, I have doubts about an algorithm, no matter how sophisticated, being able to ascertain and solve the cognitive or emotional barriers unique to each student. AI, lacking a theory of mind, cannot effectively assess and address conceptual or emotional blocks particular to each student in a given moment. Moreover, a tool that promotes the independence (isolation!?) depicted in your scenario takes humans out of the loop, to the potential detriment of learning. I don’t see it directing students to helpful humans. Be careful not to oversell what technology can do

Perhaps I have misread the proposal or read too much into it. This is how it lands for me. Take it as one potential “customer’s” feedback. Good luck! @benjamin

Expand full comment
Janet Ridsdale's avatar

henomenal support for students. As someone who is a non techie/beginner level, who loves all things technology and sees so many possibilities for AI /Gen AI/AI Agents to make our lives better. I am wondering if there are resources for people that are basically 'plug and play'?

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts